UPDATED: 04-03-26 10:21 PDT

men Belmont Abbey 2
  
Belmont Abbey         
W-L: ( 9- 3) PR = 93.2973

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 207 N Mars Hill SAC ( 1- 9, 88.0) 12-11 214 H Catawba SAC ( 7- 2, 94.7) 12-13 221 A Montevallo PBC ( 5- 7, 92.4) 8- 7 228 H Wingate SAC ( 8- 1, 97.5) 10-12 304 H Lees-McRae Carolinas ( 8- 5, 92.2) 14-11 307 H Florida Tech SSC ( 7- 2, 96.5) 2-14 311 H Alabama-Huntsville PBC ( 3-10, 89.9) 19- 6 314 A Chowan Carolinas ( 5- 6, 87.0) 29- 4 318 A Lander PBC ( 5- 7, 90.9) 15-13 321 A Young Harris PBC ( 1-10, 85.1) 23- 6 324 H North Greenville Carolinas ( 8- 5, 92.5) 9- 8 328 H Barton Carolinas ( 4- 7, 90.3) 16- 6 401 A Emmanuel (GA) Carolinas ( 2-10, 85.3) 411 H Shorter PBC ( 0- 6, 81.1) 417 A Mount Olive Carolinas ( 4- 5, 89.5)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   207 N Mars Hill              12-11       1     5    --    -4.00
   214 H Catawba                12-13      -1    -1           0.06
   221 A Montevallo              8- 7       1     1           0.44
   228 H Wingate                10-12      -2    -4           1.85
   304 H Lees-McRae             14-11       3     1           1.56
   307 H Florida Tech            2-14     -12    -3    -     -2.16
   311 H Alabama-Huntsville     19- 6      13     4           1.22
   314 A Chowan                 29- 4      25     6           0.00
   318 A Lander                 15-13       2     2          -0.04
   321 A Young Harris           23- 6      17     8           0.00
   324 H North Greenville        9- 8       1     1          -0.15
   328 H Barton                 16- 6      10     3           1.59

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   207 N Mars Hill              12-11       1     5    --    -4.00
   307 H Florida Tech            2-14     -12    -3    -     -2.16

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

Belmont Abbey Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Adams State Belmont Abbey   Belmont Abbey
Adelphi Adelphi   Adelphi
Alabama-Huntsville Belmont Abbey Belmont Abbey  
American International Belmont Abbey   Belmont Abbey
Anderson (SC) Anderson (SC) tied - ( 4- 2) ( 4- 2) Anderson (SC)
Assumption Assumption   Assumption
Barton Belmont Abbey Belmont Abbey  
Bentley Bentley   Bentley
Bridgeport Belmont Abbey   Belmont Abbey
Caldwell Belmont Abbey   Belmont Abbey
Catawba Catawba Catawba  
Chestnut Hill Belmont Abbey   Belmont Abbey
Chowan Belmont Abbey Belmont Abbey  
Coker Belmont Abbey insuffient: ( 4- 1)( 3- 2) Belmont Abbey
Colorado Mesa Colorado Mesa   Colorado Mesa
Concordia-Irvine Belmont Abbey insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) Belmont Abbey
D'Youville Belmont Abbey   Belmont Abbey
Davenport Belmont Abbey   Belmont Abbey
Davis & Elkins Belmont Abbey insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Belmont Abbey
District of Columbia Belmont Abbey   Belmont Abbey
Dominican (CA) Belmont Abbey Belmont Abbey   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Dominican (NY) Belmont Abbey   Belmont Abbey
Embry-Riddle Embry-Riddle tied - ( 4- 1) ( 4- 1) Embry-Riddle
Emmanuel (GA) Belmont Abbey Belmont Abbey   6- 0 vs 1- 5
Emory & Henry Belmont Abbey Belmont Abbey   2- 1 vs 0- 3
Felician Belmont Abbey   Belmont Abbey
Flagler Flagler tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) Flagler
Florida Southern Belmont Abbey tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Belmont Abbey
Florida Tech Florida Tech Florida Tech  
Franklin Pierce Belmont Abbey   Belmont Abbey
Frostburg State Frostburg State   Frostburg State
Georgian Court Belmont Abbey   Belmont Abbey
Holy Family Belmont Abbey   Belmont Abbey
Indianapolis Indianapolis tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Indianapolis
Lake Erie Belmont Abbey   Belmont Abbey
Lander Belmont Abbey Belmont Abbey  
Lees-McRae Belmont Abbey Belmont Abbey  
Lenoir-Rhyne Lenoir-Rhyne insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 3- 1) Lenoir-Rhyne
Lewis Lewis   Lewis
Limestone Belmont Abbey   Belmont Abbey
Lincoln Memorial Belmont Abbey insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) Belmont Abbey
Lynn Belmont Abbey insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Belmont Abbey
Malone Belmont Abbey   Belmont Abbey
Mars Hill Belmont Abbey Belmont Abbey  
Maryville Maryville tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Maryville
Mercy Mercy   Mercy
Molloy Molloy   Molloy
Montevallo Belmont Abbey Belmont Abbey  
Mount Olive Belmont Abbey Belmont Abbey   4- 1 vs 2- 3
Newberry Newberry insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 4- 0) Newberry
North Greenville Belmont Abbey Belmont Abbey  
Northwood Belmont Abbey   Belmont Abbey
Pace Pace   Pace
Palm Beach Atlantic Belmont Abbey tied - ( 5- 0) ( 5- 0) Belmont Abbey
Post Belmont Abbey tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Belmont Abbey
Quincy Belmont Abbey insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Belmont Abbey
Roberts Wesleyan Belmont Abbey   Belmont Abbey
Rockhurst Rockhurst   Rockhurst
Rollins Rollins tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Rollins
Seton Hill Seton Hill   Seton Hill
Shorter Belmont Abbey Belmont Abbey   3- 0 vs 0- 3
Southern New Hampshire Southern New Hampshire   Southern New Hampshire
St Anselm St Anselm   St Anselm
St Leo St Leo tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) St Leo
St Michaels St Michaels   St Michaels
St Thomas Aquinas Belmont Abbey   Belmont Abbey
Tampa Tampa insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) Tampa
Thomas More Belmont Abbey tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Belmont Abbey
Tiffin Belmont Abbey insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Belmont Abbey
Tusculum Belmont Abbey tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) Belmont Abbey
Virginia State Belmont Abbey Belmont Abbey   4- 0 vs 0- 4
Walsh Belmont Abbey   Belmont Abbey
Westminster (UT) Westminster (UT)   Westminster (UT)
Wheeling Belmont Abbey   Belmont Abbey
William Jewell Belmont Abbey   Belmont Abbey
Wilmington (DE) Wilmington (DE) tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Wilmington (DE)
Wingate Wingate Wingate  
Young Harris Belmont Abbey Belmont Abbey  

PowerWise = 49


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 9.19

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 N Mars Hill       ( 1- 9, 88.0)    12-11      -11.93      10.63      -0.00         0.77             8.14
   0 H Catawba         ( 7- 2, 94.7)    12-13       -5.18      17.37      -0.36         0.77            -4.25
   0 A Montevallo      ( 5- 7, 92.4)     8- 7       -7.52      15.03       0.36         0.77            11.79
   0 H Wingate         ( 8- 1, 97.5)    10-12       -2.39      20.16      -0.36         0.77            -2.11
   0 H Lees-McRae      ( 8- 5, 92.2)    14-11       -7.68      14.87      -0.36         0.77            11.11
   0 H Florida Tech    ( 7- 2, 96.5)     2-14       -3.40      19.15      -0.36         0.77            -2.88
   0 H Alabama-Huntsv  ( 3-10, 89.9)    19- 6      -10.02      12.53      -0.36         0.77             9.32
   0 A Chowan          ( 5- 6, 87.0)    29- 4      -12.94       9.61       0.36         0.77             7.64
   0 A Lander          ( 5- 7, 90.9)    15-13       -9.00      13.55       0.36         0.77            10.66
   0 A Young Harris    ( 1-10, 85.1)    23- 6      -14.76       7.80       0.36         0.77             6.25
   0 H North Greenvil  ( 8- 5, 92.5)     9- 8       -7.39      15.16      -0.36         0.77            11.33
   0 H Barton          ( 4- 7, 90.3)    16- 6       -9.65      12.90      -0.36         0.77             9.60
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                        76.60

winning pts = 85.8391 losing points = -9.2412

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------