Belmont Abbey 
W-L: (11- 4) PR = 93.7617
Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score
201 A Mars Hill SAC ( 7- 9, 89.4) 14- 6
207 H Rollins SSC (10- 8, 95.5) 6-17
215 A Catawba SAC ( 9- 7, 92.3) 11-13
222 H Montevallo PBC (10- 6, 93.7) 7- 6
301 H Florida Southern SSC ( 3-11, 94.3) 10- 6
308 A Coker SAC ( 7- 9, 90.1) 12- 7
315 A Barton Carolinas ( 5-10, 89.5) 11- 6
325 H Young Harris PBC ( 5- 9, 87.1) 13- 1
329 H Mount Olive Carolinas ( 7- 7, 90.8) 13- 6
402 A Lees-McRae Carolinas ( 3-10, 86.5) 21- 7
405 A North Greenville Carolinas (12- 4, 93.3) 9-11
412 H Chowan Carolinas ( 1-11, 83.5) 18- 6
416 H Emmanuel (GA) Carolinas ( 8- 7, 88.3) 14- 6
425 A Mount Olive Carolinas ( 7- 7, 90.8) 10- 8
427 N North Greenville Carolinas (12- 4, 93.3) 5- 6
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
201 A Mars Hill 14- 6 8 4 1.32
207 H Rollins 6-17 -11 -1 - -3.94
215 A Catawba 11-13 -2 1 - -2.77
222 H Montevallo 7- 6 1 1 0.32
301 H Florida Southern 10- 6 4 0 + 3.87
308 A Coker 12- 7 5 3 1.96
315 A Barton 11- 6 5 4 1.41
325 H Young Harris 13- 1 12 7 0.00
329 H Mount Olive 13- 6 7 4 1.41
402 A Lees-McRae 21- 7 14 7 0.00
405 A North Greenville 9-11 -2 0 -1.81
412 H Chowan 18- 6 12 11 0.00
416 H Emmanuel (GA) 14- 6 8 6 0.00
425 A Mount Olive 10- 8 2 2 -0.30
427 N North Greenville 5- 6 -1 0 -1.46
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
207 H Rollins 6-17 -11 -1 - -3.94
215 A Catawba 11-13 -2 1 - -2.77
|
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
301 H Florida Southern 10- 6 4 0 + 3.87
|
Belmont Abbey Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent |
Who Gets the Point?
| Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
Adams State |
Belmont Abbey |
|
 
| Belmont Abbey |
Adelphi |
Adelphi |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) |
Adelphi |
Alabama-Huntsville |
Belmont Abbey |
|
Belmont Abbey   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
American International |
Belmont Abbey |
|
 
| Belmont Abbey |
Anderson (SC) |
Anderson (SC) |
|
insuffient: ( 3- 3)( 4- 2) |
Anderson (SC) |
Assumption |
Assumption |
|
 
| Assumption |
Barton |
Belmont Abbey |
Belmont Abbey |
 
| |
Bentley |
Bentley |
|
 
| Bentley |
Bridgeport |
Belmont Abbey |
|
 
| Belmont Abbey |
Caldwell |
Belmont Abbey |
|
 
| Belmont Abbey |
Catawba |
Catawba |
Catawba |
 
| |
Chestnut Hill |
Belmont Abbey |
|
 
| Belmont Abbey |
Chowan |
Belmont Abbey |
Belmont Abbey |
 
| |
Coker |
Belmont Abbey |
Belmont Abbey |
 
| |
Colorado Mesa |
Colorado Mesa |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Colorado Mesa |
Concordia-Irvine |
Concordia-Irvine |
|
tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) |
Concordia-Irvine |
D'Youville |
Belmont Abbey |
|
 
| Belmont Abbey |
Davenport |
Belmont Abbey |
|
 
| Belmont Abbey |
Davis & Elkins |
Belmont Abbey |
|
Belmont Abbey   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
District of Columbia |
Belmont Abbey |
|
 
| Belmont Abbey |
Dominican (CA) |
Belmont Abbey |
|
 
| Belmont Abbey |
Dominican (NY) |
Belmont Abbey |
|
 
| Belmont Abbey |
Embry-Riddle |
Embry-Riddle |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 1) |
Embry-Riddle |
Emmanuel (GA) |
Belmont Abbey |
Belmont Abbey |
 
| |
Emory & Henry |
Belmont Abbey |
|
Belmont Abbey   5- 1 vs 0- 6 |
|
Felician |
Belmont Abbey |
|
 
| Belmont Abbey |
Flagler |
Flagler |
|
insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 4- 0) |
Flagler |
Florida Southern |
Belmont Abbey |
Belmont Abbey |
 
| |
Florida Tech |
Florida Tech |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 3- 1) |
Florida Tech |
Franklin Pierce |
Belmont Abbey |
|
 
| Belmont Abbey |
Frostburg State |
Belmont Abbey |
|
 
| Belmont Abbey |
Georgian Court |
Belmont Abbey |
|
 
| Belmont Abbey |
Holy Family |
Belmont Abbey |
|
 
| Belmont Abbey |
Indianapolis |
Indianapolis |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Indianapolis |
Lake Erie |
Belmont Abbey |
|
 
| Belmont Abbey |
Lander |
Lander |
|
tied - ( 4- 1) ( 4- 1) |
Lander |
Lees-McRae |
Belmont Abbey |
Belmont Abbey |
 
| |
Lenoir-Rhyne |
Lenoir-Rhyne |
|
Lenoir-Rhyne   5- 0 vs 3- 2 |
|
Lewis |
Lewis |
|
 
| Lewis |
Limestone |
Limestone |
|
insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 4- 0) |
Limestone |
Lincoln Memorial |
Belmont Abbey |
|
insuffient: ( 3- 2)( 2- 3) |
Belmont Abbey |
Lynn |
Lynn |
|
Lynn   3- 0 vs 1- 2 |
|
Malone |
Belmont Abbey |
|
Belmont Abbey   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
Mars Hill |
Belmont Abbey |
Belmont Abbey |
 
| |
Maryville |
Maryville |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) |
Maryville |
Mercy |
Belmont Abbey |
|
 
| Belmont Abbey |
Molloy |
Molloy |
|
 
| Molloy |
Montevallo |
Belmont Abbey |
Belmont Abbey |
 
| |
Mount Olive |
Belmont Abbey |
Belmont Abbey |
 
| |
Newberry |
Newberry |
|
insuffient: ( 4- 1)( 5- 0) |
Newberry |
North Greenville |
North Greenville |
North Greenville |
 
| |
Northwood |
Belmont Abbey |
|
 
| Belmont Abbey |
Pace |
Pace |
|
 
| Pace |
Palm Beach Atlantic |
Palm Beach Atlantic |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) |
Palm Beach Atlantic |
Post |
Belmont Abbey |
|
 
| Belmont Abbey |
Quincy |
Belmont Abbey |
|
 
| Belmont Abbey |
Roberts Wesleyan |
Belmont Abbey |
|
 
| Belmont Abbey |
Rockhurst |
Rockhurst |
|
 
| Rockhurst |
Rollins |
Rollins |
Rollins |
 
| |
Seton Hill |
Seton Hill |
|
 
| Seton Hill |
Shorter |
Belmont Abbey |
|
 
| Belmont Abbey |
Southern New Hampshire |
Belmont Abbey |
|
 
| Belmont Abbey |
St Anselm |
St Anselm |
|
 
| St Anselm |
St Leo |
St Leo |
|
tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) |
St Leo |
St Michaels |
Belmont Abbey |
|
 
| Belmont Abbey |
St Thomas Aquinas |
Belmont Abbey |
|
 
| Belmont Abbey |
Tampa |
Tampa |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) |
Tampa |
Thomas More |
Belmont Abbey |
|
Belmont Abbey   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
Tiffin |
Belmont Abbey |
|
 
| Belmont Abbey |
Tusculum |
Belmont Abbey |
|
Belmont Abbey   6- 1 vs 2- 5 |
|
Virginia State |
Belmont Abbey |
|
Belmont Abbey   3- 1 vs 0- 4 |
|
Walsh |
Belmont Abbey |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Belmont Abbey |
Westminster (UT) |
Belmont Abbey |
|
tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) |
Belmont Abbey |
Wheeling |
Belmont Abbey |
|
 
| Belmont Abbey |
William Jewell |
Belmont Abbey |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) |
Belmont Abbey |
Wilmington (DE) |
Belmont Abbey |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Belmont Abbey |
Wingate |
Wingate |
|
insuffient: ( 5- 1)( 6- 0) |
Wingate |
Young Harris |
Belmont Abbey |
Belmont Abbey |
 
| |
PowerWise = 49

division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 14.61
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Mars Hill ( 7- 9, 89.4) 14- 6 -10.46 14.63 0.64 0.97 14.88
0 H Rollins (10- 8, 95.5) 6-17 -4.43 20.66 -0.64 0.97 -4.94
0 A Catawba ( 9- 7, 92.3) 11-13 -7.56 17.54 0.64 0.97 -6.73
0 H Montevallo (10- 6, 93.7) 7- 6 -6.18 18.92 -0.64 0.97 17.80
0 H Florida Southe ( 3-11, 94.3) 10- 6 -5.62 19.47 -0.64 0.97 18.34
0 A Coker ( 7- 9, 90.1) 12- 7 -9.82 15.28 0.64 0.97 15.50
0 A Barton ( 5-10, 89.5) 11- 6 -10.38 14.72 0.64 0.97 14.96
0 H Young Harris ( 5- 9, 87.1) 13- 1 -12.77 12.32 -0.64 0.97 11.37
0 H Mount Olive ( 7- 7, 90.8) 13- 6 -9.08 16.02 -0.64 0.97 14.97
0 A Lees-McRae ( 3-10, 86.5) 21- 7 -13.37 11.73 0.64 0.97 12.05
0 A North Greenvil (12- 4, 93.3) 9-11 -6.59 18.50 0.64 0.97 -5.79
0 H Chowan ( 1-11, 83.5) 18- 6 -16.43 8.66 -0.64 0.97 7.81
0 H Emmanuel (GA) ( 8- 7, 88.3) 14- 6 -11.62 13.48 -0.64 0.97 12.50
0 A Mount Olive ( 7- 7, 90.8) 10- 8 -9.08 16.02 0.64 0.97 16.22
0 N North Greenvil (12- 4, 93.3) 5- 6 -6.59 18.50 -0.00 0.97 -6.42
------
132.50
|
winning pts = 156.3981 losing points = -23.8932
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------