Belmont Abbey
W-L: (12- 4) PR = 93.5685Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 207 N Mars Hill SAC ( 2-12, 88.2) 12-11 214 H Catawba SAC (11- 4, 95.2) 12-13 221 A Montevallo PBC ( 9- 8, 93.7) 8- 7 228 H Wingate SAC (13- 3, 98.1) 10-12 304 H Lees-McRae Carolinas (11- 6, 93.0) 14-11 307 H Florida Tech SSC (12- 5, 97.0) 2-14 311 H Alabama-Huntsville PBC ( 5-14, 89.6) 19- 6 314 A Chowan Carolinas ( 5- 9, 86.2) 29- 4 318 A Lander PBC ( 6- 9, 91.2) 15-13 321 A Young Harris PBC ( 3-13, 86.3) 23- 6 324 H North Greenville Carolinas (11- 7, 92.6) 9- 8 328 H Barton Carolinas (10- 8, 91.5) 16- 6 401 A Emmanuel (GA) Carolinas ( 3-12, 85.6) 25- 7 411 H Shorter PBC ( 0-10, 79.8) 35- 2 417 A Mount Olive Carolinas ( 5- 8, 89.3) 14- 3 424 N Barton Carolinas (10- 8, 91.5) 12-13
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
207 N Mars Hill 12-11 1 5 -- -4.00
214 H Catawba 12-13 -1 -1 0.12
221 A Montevallo 8- 7 1 -1 1.66
228 H Wingate 10-12 -2 -4 + 2.02
304 H Lees-McRae 14-11 3 1 1.92
307 H Florida Tech 2-14 -12 -3 - -2.13
311 H Alabama-Huntsville 19- 6 13 4 0.52
314 A Chowan 29- 4 25 7 0.00
318 A Lander 15-13 2 2 0.13
321 A Young Harris 23- 6 17 7 0.00
324 H North Greenville 9- 8 1 2 -0.50
328 H Barton 16- 6 10 3 + 2.42
401 A Emmanuel (GA) 25- 7 18 7 0.00
411 H Shorter 35- 2 33 14 0.00
417 A Mount Olive 14- 3 11 4 1.26
424 N Barton 12-13 -1 2 - -3.04
|
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 207 N Mars Hill 12-11 1 5 -- -4.00 307 H Florida Tech 2-14 -12 -3 - -2.13 424 N Barton 12-13 -1 2 - -3.04 |
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 228 H Wingate 10-12 -2 -4 + 2.02 328 H Barton 16- 6 10 3 + 2.42 |
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adams State | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey | ||
| Adelphi | Adelphi | Adelphi | ||
| Alabama-Huntsville | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey | ||
| American International | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey | ||
| Anderson (SC) | Anderson (SC) | Anderson (SC) 5- 2 vs 5- 3 | ||
| Assumption | Assumption | Assumption | ||
| Barton | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey 7- 1 vs 5- 3 | ||
| Bentley | Bentley | Bentley | ||
| Bridgeport | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey | ||
| Caldwell | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey | ||
| Catawba | Catawba | Catawba | ||
| Chestnut Hill | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey | ||
| Chowan | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey | ||
| Coker | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey 6- 3 vs 5- 3 | ||
| Colorado Mesa | Colorado Mesa | Colorado Mesa | ||
| Concordia-Irvine | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey 2- 1 vs 1- 2 | ||
| D'Youville | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey | ||
| Davenport | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey | ||
| Davis & Elkins | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey 1- 0 vs 0- 1 | ||
| District of Columbia | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey | ||
| Dominican (CA) | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Dominican (NY) | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey | ||
| Embry-Riddle | Embry-Riddle | tied - 4- 1 | Embry-Riddle | |
| Emmanuel (GA) | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey | ||
| Emory & Henry | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey 4- 3 vs 0- 6 | ||
| Felician | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey | ||
| Flagler | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey 4- 1 vs 3- 2 | ||
| Florida Southern | Florida Southern | tied - 0- 2 | Florida Southern | |
| Florida Tech | Florida Tech | Florida Tech | ||
| Franklin Pierce | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey | ||
| Frostburg State | Frostburg State | Frostburg State | ||
| Georgian Court | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey | ||
| Holy Family | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey | ||
| Indianapolis | Indianapolis | tied - 2- 0 | Indianapolis | |
| Lake Erie | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey | ||
| Lander | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey | ||
| Lees-McRae | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey | ||
| Lenoir-Rhyne | Lenoir-Rhyne | Lenoir-Rhyne 4- 1 vs 2- 3 | ||
| Lewis | Lewis | Lewis | ||
| Limestone | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey | ||
| Lincoln Memorial | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey 4- 2 vs 3- 3 | ||
| Lynn | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey 1- 1 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Malone | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey | ||
| Mars Hill | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey | ||
| Maryville | Maryville | tied - 2- 0 | Maryville | |
| Mercy | Mercy | Mercy | ||
| Molloy | Molloy | Molloy | ||
| Montevallo | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey | ||
| Mount Olive | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey | ||
| Newberry | Newberry | Newberry 5- 1 vs 4- 2 | ||
| North Greenville | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey | ||
| Northwood | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey | ||
| Pace | Pace | Pace | ||
| Palm Beach Atlantic | Palm Beach Atlantic | Palm Beach Atlantic 5- 1 vs 5- 2 | ||
| Post | Belmont Abbey | tied - 1- 0 | Belmont Abbey | |
| Quincy | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey 1- 0 vs 0- 1 | ||
| Roberts Wesleyan | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey | ||
| Rockhurst | Rockhurst | Rockhurst | ||
| Rollins | Rollins | tied - 0- 1 | Rollins | |
| Seton Hill | Seton Hill | Seton Hill | ||
| Shorter | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey | ||
| Southern New Hampshire | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey | ||
| St Anselm | St Anselm | St Anselm | ||
| St Leo | St Leo | tied - 2- 2 | St Leo | |
| St Michaels | St Michaels | St Michaels | ||
| St Thomas Aquinas | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey | ||
| Tampa | Tampa | Tampa 2- 0 vs 1- 1 | ||
| Thomas More | Belmont Abbey | tied - 1- 0 | Belmont Abbey | |
| Tiffin | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey 2- 0 vs 1- 1 | ||
| Tusculum | Belmont Abbey | tied - 4- 2 | Belmont Abbey | |
| Virginia State | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey 6- 1 vs 0- 6 | ||
| Walsh | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey | ||
| Westminster (UT) | Westminster (UT) | Westminster (UT) | ||
| Wheeling | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey | ||
| William Jewell | Belmont Abbey | tied - 2- 0 | Belmont Abbey | |
| Wilmington (DE) | Wilmington (DE) | Wilmington (DE) 1- 0 vs 1- 1 | ||
| Wingate | Wingate | Wingate | ||
| Young Harris | Belmont Abbey | Belmont Abbey |
division Games Only
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 N Mars Hill ( 2-12, 88.2) 12-11 -11.70 10.24 -0.00 0.92 9.42
0 H Catawba (11- 4, 95.2) 12-13 -4.67 17.28 -0.54 0.92 -4.79
0 A Montevallo ( 9- 8, 93.7) 8- 7 -6.21 15.73 0.54 0.92 14.96
0 H Wingate (13- 3, 98.1) 10-12 -1.77 20.17 -0.54 0.92 -2.12
0 H Lees-McRae (11- 6, 93.0) 14-11 -6.87 15.08 -0.54 0.92 13.36
0 H Florida Tech (12- 5, 97.0) 2-14 -2.92 19.03 -0.54 0.92 -3.18
0 H Alabama-Huntsv ( 5-14, 89.6) 19- 6 -10.27 11.67 -0.54 0.92 10.23
0 A Chowan ( 5- 9, 86.2) 29- 4 -13.67 8.27 0.54 0.92 8.10
0 A Lander ( 6- 9, 91.2) 15-13 -8.74 13.21 0.54 0.92 12.64
0 A Young Harris ( 3-13, 86.3) 23- 6 -13.56 8.38 0.54 0.92 8.20
0 H North Greenvil (11- 7, 92.6) 9- 8 -7.29 14.65 -0.54 0.92 12.97
0 H Barton (10- 8, 91.5) 16- 6 -8.37 13.57 -0.54 0.92 11.98
0 A Emmanuel (GA) ( 3-12, 85.6) 25- 7 -14.30 7.64 0.54 0.92 7.52
0 H Shorter ( 0-10, 79.8) 35- 2 -20.12 1.83 -0.54 0.92 1.18
0 A Mount Olive ( 5- 8, 89.3) 14- 3 -10.61 11.33 0.54 0.92 10.91
0 N Barton (10- 8, 91.5) 12-13 -8.37 13.57 -0.00 0.92 -7.70
------
103.69
|
